www.onebee.com

Web standards alert

Account: log in (or sign up)
onebee Writing Photos Reviews About

The English Patient Effect

Recently, in the context of his mounting disdain for Little Miss Sunshine, Andy invoked the English Patient Effect, which is when one's appreciation for a movie plummets in proportion to the crazed adulation being heaped upon it by film critics, awards shows, or regular moviegoers.

When we originally went to see The English Patient, we liked it quite a bit. Or at the very least, we were unoffended by it. By the time the film swept the Oscars (11 years ago – yikes!), we hated it. It now shares with Affliction the ignominious distinction of being invoked whenever we want to describe how utterly terrible a movie is.

Which is not to say that the phenomenon which bears its name should be interpreted as the ultimate insult. Little Miss Sunshine is a far better movie than The English Patient – whether Andy thinks so or not – and so is my EPE Movie of the Year: Pan's Labyrinth. I certainly didn't dislike Pan's Labyrinth. It was imaginative and creatively realized, with some very fine performances and themes. However, its narrative unfolded with a sort of metronomic regularity which diluted the impact of the fantasy sequences. Tick – Ofelia is mistreated by her fascist military stepfather; tock – she plunges through the looking glass of yet another weirdo fantasy encounter. Film reviewers are recommending that young children skip the movie because of the bad words in the subtitles and the explicit gore in a few scenes, but the story's framework has been crafted to their sensibilities, with the accompanying lack of credible peril for Ofelia and the shallow, episodic feel of her adventures – perfect for bedtime reading, drop a bookmark anywhere and pick up where you left off tomorrow night.

I enjoyed the movie and I'm glad I saw it, but it fell far short of capturing my imagination. And as engaged as I was in the grown-up half of the story (Ofelia's stepfather and his thugs of the newly implanted Franco regime, beset by wily hillside insurgents whose last throes stubbornly refuse to end), it always seemed like a distraction from Ofelia's story. The bloodbaths are raw and visceral, but the characters are starkly painted black-hat villains and white-hat freedom fighters, and it doesn't really affect Ofelia aside from the extremely inopportune timing of her half-brother's birth.

Pan's Labyrinth is a clever look at the power of imagination and the timelessness of fairy tales, but it's hardly the best picture of the year, a masterpiece, or the seminal work of a generation. To be fair, I expected none of these things when I went to see it. I just thought it would be interesting and have some fun visuals. (Sadly, aside from the new Bob Odenkirk and a ton of grasshopper footage, the visuals aren't much to speak of. It's nice, but it's nothing you couldn't find at Military Re-enactment Day on the set of Edward Scissorhands.) It could have been a nice little mid-range movie. I'm still without my Worthwhile Serious Film of 2006, but that's okay.

But, I like to read through the review blurbs on Metacritic whenever its scores are markedly different from my own. (It happens from time to time, though rarely to such a staggering extent.*) And that's where the English Patient Effect kicked in. These people are insane! They go on and on about "masterpiece" this and "transcendent work of art" that. It "leaves us shaken to our souls." It does? My soul just needed to pee.

So, congratulations, Guillermo del Toro, on a fine little movie. Very nice and perfectly entertaining. I'm sorry I didn't like it more, but considering the staggering curve set by the movie critics, I'm just glad I got out alive.

*42 points! That's a whole The Gift! Or Silent Running plus Freddy Got Fingered!
9 Comments (Add your comments)

ACThu, 2/1/07 3:15am

I must admit, it wasn't what I expected and it certainly wasn't as good as Children of Men, but nonetheless, I found it refreshingly unpredictable.

But I do fear the gushing. I think over-zealous adulation is tantamount to your baby sister stealing your most precious toy and thus laying waste to your magical one-on-one connection with it– the thrill is absolutely and irretrievably gone for good. And you can't help but be incredibly bitter.

Anyway, I'm avoiding those crazy reviews like the plague. Luckily, Children of Men seems to have escaped the rabble, and for that I'm eternally grateful.

BrandonThu, 2/1/07 2:21pm

But, I like to read through the review blurbs on Metacritic whenever its scores are markedly different from my own. (It happens from time to time, though rarely to such a staggering extent.)

You seem to have a similar situation - albeit not quite to the same staggering extent, and in the opposite direction - with Smokin' Aces, which has a Metacritic composite score of 45 and has not received a review over 75.

Bee BoyThu, 2/1/07 2:37pm

Ha ha, good point. This is the problem with movie critics, and it's why I almost never read reviews and certainly not before I've seen the film. It's impossible to know who to trust, but it seems like a random number generator would be more reliable than AMPAS or a movie critic. (I certainly don't nominate myself for the job; I store my ratings mainly for my own reference, and display them only in case you're curious. Asking a friend who's seen the movie what he thought is probably the only method more reliable than a stab in the dark.)

Reading EW's pre-pre-Oscar coverage, I came across phrases like Little Miss Sunshine would be overshadowed by "more serious competition" or United 93 and Casino Royale were successful and critically acclaimed, but the Academy "doesn't go for action." What the fuck?! I know I'm not breaking new ground here, but this seems like a supremely asinine way to gauge the worthiness of a film. If "good" takes a back seat to "maudlin" and "lacking explosions," you've gone awry.

As it is, there are so many things that seem to trick reviewers into liking an otherwise unworthy movie. There should be some kind of formula...

(retard + homo + downtrodden world-weary soldier) x (futuristic dystopia + Victorian England) / (explosions + car chases + laughs + nudity)

And, if that fails, check out the quality of the script or the performances. But only in case of emergency!

Joe MulderThu, 2/1/07 9:01pm

For what it's worth, I move that we rechristen The English Patient Effect; it should now be knows as The Borat Effect.

Bee BoyThu, 2/1/07 11:42pm

Whoever stole Joe's onebee.com login, this is no longer funny. I was willing to go along with the Scrubs musical thing, but this– people could get hurt, goddammit!

Joe MulderFri, 2/2/07 12:30pm

Twenty minutes! He did the legitimately hilarious "Borat" schtick from the TV show for twenty minutes in that whole goddam movie! The rest of it wasn't funny!

Except for that fat guy's nutsack. That was funny.

Bee BoyFri, 2/2/07 12:42pm

Haven't seen the TV show, so I can't say what's legitimate Borat and what's not. Playing dumb while asking mean questions? The "on location" bit in his village? Not sure. But I laughed harder and longer than I ever have at the movies. Some of them are not laughs I'm proud of, but that's not the point.

Did the whole narrative kind of peter out towards the end, with the Pamela Anderson obsession? Sure. Did the subterfuge against innocent dullards become somewhat repetitive? Yes. They could have left the frat boys on the cutting room floor and spared themselves one of many lawsuits.

However, as an illustration of the commitment to a character, and as an awesome spectacle of improvisational comedy as an art form, it's an unparalleled triumph. (In which, to be fair, the fat guy's nutsack plays a pivotal part.) Whether or not the rest of it was perfect, it will always hold a spot in my top movies for how thoroughly Sacha committed to his role.

It wasn't the year's best film, but to put it alongside The English Patient? I cry foul.

BrandonFri, 2/2/07 10:19pm

I gotta side with Jameson on this one. I finally saw Borat two weeks ago, and even in the wake of a fair amount of hype (and raised expectations), I found it quite hilarious and enjoyable.

Bee BoyTue, 2/20/07 3:23pm

It should be noted, by those who take note of such things, that this week's "Entertainment Weekly" Oscar picks article began with a giant version of a formula very much like the one I described above.

Krumholtz, baby!

Your Comments
Name: OR Login / Register to comment
e-mail:

Comments: (show/hide formatting tips)

send me e-mail when new comments are posted

onebee
Recently

THE LATEST FROM POOP READING: